Recent speculation

In the last couple of weeks I came across different topics, which gave rise to a million questions and makes me feel that what is considered to be the “official” truth is far away from the actual facts. First of all, I watched certain documentaries on the food industry and how manufactures use preservatives, additives, colorants and what not, to obtain the desired product and boost their standings in the nutritional facts. For generations now, people have been ingesting all types of foods that resemble more the characteristics of a polymer than the ones of an actual organic food, exposing themselves to long-term side effects that lie far from our understanding due to the improper amount of research that should have been done before these products reach any supermarket. A new trend in alienating natural components of our diet, like sugar for instance, while replacing it with artificial solutions, has already  been part of our eating habits for some time. I really wish we could have an easier access to organic foods and at the same time know what are really the effects of all the added ingredients of processed and high dense foods. Is it not obvious to see a correlation between the large number of new diseases, like diabetes and obesity, that have developed rapidly in the las century with the dietary habits of our current processed-food culture?

The second subject I came across is the huge mystery of 9/11. In short, everything that the media and the government claims to be what really happened doesn’t fit in the actual puzzle. There is no doubt that I can not come up with what actually happened, but I believe I can at least have some idea of what did not happen. More than eight years have passed since the incident and yet I think that the majority of people have bought the story told by the official report as if it were the medicine that one conceals in a piece of bread which is given to a sick dog. There is no question to me that the claim that an actual airliner hit the Pentagon is completely bogus. From my knowledge in engineering so far I know that  a jet engine will not vaporize upon a crash, nor disappear as it seemed to have been the case! Besides, the extent of the damage would have been far greater (debris from the aircraft would have been completely visible around the supposable crash area)  than what resembles more accurately to have been some sort of military weapon or missile. All the footage was rapidly confiscated leaving the public completely vulnerable against the facts. This leads to another question: given that there was no such airplane crash in the Pentagon, what happened to that flight? Are we supposed to believe what was told as the truth from the crashes in the World Trade Center AFTER one event proves to be far from the facts?? Even the available footage from the Towers is dubious and does not really fit in the whole picture. And the collapse of both buildings is another topic of discussion that I will not enter for now. At this point I cannot rule out any possibilities.

Advertisement